Talk:Janardana

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal[edit]

Since this page looks like it describes the title of another deity, maybe it would be best to merge this information to the deity in question and switch this to a redirect. It doesn't look like there is much scope for expansion here. Simon Burchell (talk) 12:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose -- It is not only the name of Vishnu but also a popular name of Krishna. So merging in Vishnu will loose the content relating to Krishna. Wikid ^as© 12:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose-- Since Janardana is the title of two different deities it would be inappropriate to merge the article to a single deity.Skr15081997 (talk) 10:23, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]