Jump to content

Talk:Janet Emerson Bashen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (The Page was recreated because it was deleted for a reason i am not sure i understand, the content is still valid and is updated as needed. ) --Jbashen (talk) 02:21, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... This wiki page along with its current content was created on Janet Emerson Bashen's request, how it got copied to another site similar Wikipedia I don't know. But I can confirm that the is no infringement. To make a guess the other site some how copied the original wiki page before it was deleted. Please do not delete. Bashen Corporations IT Manager --Boye Osoba (talk) 02:40, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May I suggest?

[edit]

To protect the article from further deletion discussions, please keep it pretty much like its current incarnation (Aug 15th 2014), please don't add content without support from reliable references, keep it short & sweet and it may avoid the chopping block.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:28, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the information is true and accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbashen (talkcontribs) 23:23, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you JBashen? Your article is in good shape, it's been fixed up, if you found any errors let us know. Do you have a photo of yourself you'd like to include? If so email me at thomaswrightsulcer (at) yahoo (dot) com; I know how to get photos uploaded. Key is having email address of photographer, or else proof that you are the copyright owner of the photo.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Question: why did you switch back the article to the problematic version? That's the version that inspired Wikipedians to put it up for deletion. Do you want it to get deleted? If you'd like your article to stay, keep it at the upgraded version here which is much more likely to pass muster; this version here which you restored is problem-prone, with unsourced allegations, and will lead others reviewing the article to DELETE it.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:38, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This entry is vague. It should say the company, etc., that is what the reader wants to know about. Otherwise it comes off as a cryptic resume version.--NorthBond (talk) 16:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Janet Emerson Bashen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]