Talk:Japanese Committee on Trade and Information/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Yulun5566 (talk · contribs) 08:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Use of referencing is diverse and well placed in article
- "Its publicly stated purpose was to promote the "traditional friendship" between the USA and Japan" Sounds awkward and should be refined
- "Obana and Townsend plead guilty, though Townsend denied that he was acting on behalf of Japan" Use of present tense is grammatically false when describing an event from the past
- There were too much details in the article that has almost no relation with the topic itself
- Average article on the whole, and if not refined, it would not qualify for GA
- New editor needed to take over this review.
- The "review" above is not in accordance with Wikipedia:Good article criteria. Experienced GA reviewer familiar with the process needed. — Maile (talk) 16:55, 28 September 2015 (UTC)