Talk:Japanese encyclopedias

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 23:12, May 16, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Bibliography task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Reference works Start‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Proposed changes[edit]

Please do not use the construction “There are currently two major encyclopedias in the Japanese language”: it is much more direct to say “Currently, the two major encyclopedias in the Japanese language are . . .” But even before this, you should say something much broader about the history of the encyclopedia in Japan. What is the source of the term “hyakka jiten”? (I suspect it is modern, which means you need a broader discussion of the historical terminology.) It would be nice to have proper encyclopedic information on Wikipedia, Silabel, etc: when did they begin, what are they (in the case of Silabel). The links to lists of online encyclopedias should have a separate sub-section of “links.” Also, aren’t some of the links mentioned worth bringing into the main article? I notice that the main Wikipedia article on “Encyclopedia” has nothing about Japan. Why don’t you add something? Jb05-Hds2 00:08, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]