Jump to content

Talk:Jarrod Washburn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pitcher or free agent?

[edit]

This doesn't read like an encyclopedic entry about a pitcher to me. The article essentially consists of one paragraph about Washburn as a person and a brief overview of his Angels statistics, and the balance is about Washburn's free agency after 2005. There's nothing about his time with Seattle except for a mention that he signed a 4/36 contract with them. It's 5:30 AM and I don't know anything about his pitching career, or I'd add something, but the focus of this article needs to be corrected. 69.209.195.144 (talk) 10:28, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have some respect. Please.

[edit]

to degrade Jarrod Washburn, the Mariners, and Chuck Armstrong in the last paragraph in such a way is completely uncalled for and inappropriate for an "encyclopedia" entry. This is not a place to go off on tangents that have little to no relevance and are arguably grossly untrue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.224.56.138 (talk) 06:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I have removed it. It was a violation of WP:BLP. --Elliskev 13:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jarrod Washburn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:39, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]