Jump to content

Talk:Java War (1741–1743)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 17:48, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:48, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Was moved to Java War (1741–1743). Seems to be an en-dash thing, so considering the arbcom case and sanctions I'm not going to get involved. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:42, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    How can you regain greater control? They can gain or assert, but not regain. Nove: on 7 October 1740 after revolted. Two "following day" in quick succession, reword.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    How is imposing a curfew related to crushing the revolt? Isn't that something separate?
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: