This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because, if it's good enough for fr.wiki, why not here? ... "unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company"?? Which company is that, exactly? He's a member of Académie des Beaux-Arts. How bizarre. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:05, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's like saying if it's good enough for a Wikia, it's good enough for here: all sites are different and have different criteria for inclusion. And in case you contested this deletion so fast you didn't actually read the banner, it says "because in its current form it serves only to promote an entity, person or product." Grammarxxx(What'd I do this time?) 22:12, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
He's a notable contemporary artist. The post on my Talk Page says this:
"... because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic."
So how would one "fundamentally re-write" this? It's a set of facts. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:20, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's not my responsibility to re-write it, as the creator that's your job. But seeing how the CSD was declined, it'll remain for now. Grammarxxx(What'd I do this time?) 22:59, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't say it was "your responsibility" to re-write it. What do you mean excatly by "for now"? Martinevans123 (talk) 23:04, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
