Talk:Jeff Pulver
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jeff Pulver article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Typo in Biography section!
[edit]There's a typo in here regarding how much money Jeffrey Citron contributed. I assume it should say $1 million instead of $! million, but I don't have the facts in front of me. Someone might want to update that and then remove this note.
Jeffholton (talk) 18:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Jeff as a notable
[edit]Notability
[edit]Jeff Pulver's notability in the social media domain is really quite significant. Yes, he's 'a personality', but his contributions to social media are significant. Many folks know him and have been influenced by his creativity, his development of VON and VONage, and his moving beyond that - and his role as a benefactor for social media advocates, hobbyists, and newbies. He's brought lots of folks into real-time synchronous communication and nurtured creativity around synchronous social media.
I'd be sad for Wikipedia to NOT have a reference page on Jeff Pulver.
MaynardClark (talk) 15:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
I thought the information was relevant enough for me to use in my work, so I have recreated it.
Brian Boyko,
Editor, Network Performance Daily
www.networkperformancedaily.com
brian.boyko@netqos.com
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.129.167.114 (talk • contribs) 16:35, 19 December 2006
Original poster claims "Copied with permission from Pulver.com" -- I'm inclined to buy that, given this blog post. Granted, I'm not entirely sure about the article, but I'm fairly sure we don't need to worry about copyvio, on this one, just yet. Just my thought. Luna Santin 00:13, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Did he invent Facebook? Did he invent LinkedIn? What exactly are his "contributions to social media"? VON, VONage? What are these? Are you referring to this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vonage 192.114.107.4 (talk) 09:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Family
[edit]Jeff Pulver has two sisters, Lauren and Michele.MaynardClark (talk) 17:59, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]This is going to come up eventually, so here's my 2¢ worth ... my take on WP:BLP is fairly simple; there is an MOS for identifying name, date/place of birth, date of death, etc. ... this is "trivial" information to locate if they are notable.
In the case of this subject, all I see is a single article from BusinessWeek and a link to the subject's own website, pulver.com ... you mean that there has not been enough press coverage that someone can say when and where he was born? That's when I slap a {{importance}} tag on it and move on ... until some deletionist does a CSD or AFD, and I get all the flack for having raised a flag in the first place. <Sigh!>
Anywho, to me this is a no-brainer ... the guy's noteriety is undeniable, but there has to be a minimum threshold of WP:RS coverage to have more than a stub, and while name/place of birth should not be made minimum requirements for notability of living people, failure to be able to locate such information in WP:RS citations does imply a lack of notability.
The BusinessWeek article meets the requirement of "non-tivial reliable independent," but it is not "multiple," and the no self-reference rule should preclude the bio on his website from inclusion in the count towards "multiple."
While what he did to "make a name for himself" is undeniably notable, what we all "know" is not the same as what we can "verify," and in this case, the subject has not received enough coverage even from their own website to provide a simple fact like when or where were they born ... now, how notable does that make them?
That is all I have to say. --72.75.85.159 09:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC) Jeff Pulver was the sponsor of PodCamp Boston 2 (10/27-28/2007). I'll add details later about why he truly IS non-trivial. Hofstra Accounting degree
—Preceding unsigned comment added by MaynardClark (talk • contribs) 17:13, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
spam: Network2 TV is a guide to TV on the Internet founded by Pulver. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.81.66.198 (talk) 21:45, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Jeff Pulver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715132015/http://www.pulver.com/reports/report16oct2000.html to http://www.pulver.com/reports/report16oct2000.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715132027/http://www.pulver.com/spring2005/schedule_edsg1100623184.html to http://www.pulver.com/spring2005/schedule_edsg1100623184.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061216044747/http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2003/tc2003041_4912_tc107.htm to http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2003/tc2003041_4912_tc107.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121025213023/http://www.businessweek.com/1996/32/b348748.htm to http://www.businessweek.com/1996/32/b348748.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110218013950/http://pulverblog.pulver.com/archives/002877.html to http://pulverblog.pulver.com/archives/002877.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131106061517/http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/docview.asp?did=1000659514&fid=1725 to http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/docview.asp?did=1000659514&fid=1725
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)