This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
Nominating for speedy one minute after creation--when there is at least one reliable ref in place--strikes me as too bitey.--Artiquities (talk) 15:16, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have added what I believe to be sufficient material for a reasonable stub.--Artiquities (talk) 16:41, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I did not intend to be bitey. The eighty articles that you have created in one month represent a substantial investment of time and effort, but you shouldn't be too sensitive to criticism. You created this article, and can be presumed to know more about the subject than most people. I am not the final arbiter of these things, and my opinion is just that - *my* opinion. You can take it or leave it, and no harm done. In my mind, however, the article won't stand up to scrutiny without adding some more substantial information relating both to why she is noteworthy and more background on her and her work. The article might pass muster as a stub as it stands, but might not. The wikilink might provides suggestions for establishing notability. TreacherousWays (talk) 18:10, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It has occurred to me that your article contributions seem to center on art. Although Jemima Stehli may not be noteworthy by herself, she may be noteworthy as a member of a group, and may deserve a paragraph in another article if this article doesn't make the cut. TreacherousWays (talk) 22:41, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The lead needs to include anything that would lock in notability. Inclusion in anthology asserts significance. Will research. Dlohcierekim 22:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Asserts significance. I see sufficient G-books hits that potential sourcing, current sourcing, and overall notability need to be considered at AFD. Dlohcierekim 22:50, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Google news hits in German, English, French and Italian. Dlohcierekim 23:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
