Talk:Jeremy Caniglia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Verification[edit]

(Heading added by --Bookgrrl 03:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The information on the Caniglia page is 100% verifiable. Caniglia is one of America's premiere illustrators and everything on his page is pure fact. There is no content that violates any copyright.If you need an address or phone numbers every fact can be backed up.

Thank you Jacqui Director of Caniglia-art

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.13.134.210 (talkcontribs) at 03:20 on 16 November 2006

Flags[edit]

(Heading added by --Bookgrrl 03:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added {{autobiography}}, {{notability}}, {{Unreferenced}} and {{tone}} tags to the article. Copyright is not an issue and never was or has been: an encyclopaedia article being used as a vehicle for promotion -- self-promotion, especially -- is the issue. The article, as is, is arguably eligible to be deleted immediately as blatant advertising for a company, product, group or service that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article under speedy deletion criterion G11. You job is to convince me -- and other editors, especially those with deletion powers -- that this is not the case. Arguing irrelevancies such as copyrights and making unsourced and unreferenced assertions such as 'everything on his page is pure fact' is not the way to do this. --CalendarWatcher 09:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate you cross referencing the material on Caniglia and I feel you are missing some of the points of just how relevant this artist is. I am not trying to argue with you but help you understand why his art is so important.

The information provided for the artist Caniglia is not a self promtional tool. I am sorry that you felt it as advertising. There are people all over the World who read the books written by the Authors Douglas Clegg, Stephen King and others etc… Since Caniglia is the creator/illustrator of the art work in those books it is very relevant that you have information on him.

I have referenced The New Masters of Horror film series as well in which IDT Entertainment used Caniglia as the Concept artist for season 1 of the Showtime Series. He also created the artwork for the DVD covers and the Comic books realated to that series. That is not self promtion but information for those who are looking for the creating art source of concept characters.

As you can see the books, movies, CDs, as well as magazines are listed with the titles of the books and authors or publishers as the source. If you would like me to add more dates by them and ISBN numbers just let me know. I am new here and I am trying my best to give you all the source links possible.

If you feel that his section was too autobiographic by all means edit the parts out that you feel are irreleavant, but don’t delete the source material of his history of books and movie work that he has created for very relevant Authors and publishers.

Caniglia’s illustration work is a huge relevance to the field of Fantasy and Horror books in the United States and Europe.

I hope we can work this out and figure out a happy medium to his reference page.

Thank you Jacqui (Caniglia 14:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Notability[edit]

I've done a rewrite to be more encyclopedia-formal in tone and add some references, and I'd vote to keep him in (despite the fact that it really irks me when people create their own articles...). He's done illustrations for notable mainstream authors (i.e. Stephen King), and the niche horror authors he's done work for (like Ed Lee and Charlee Jacobs) are recognized as being tops in their field. Also he's won an award. Put it all together and he's at least as notable as lots of other people who have entries here. --Bookgrrl 02:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's been about a week and no one has objected to the notability fixes I did, so I've removed the notability and NPOV flags. --Bookgrrl 19:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move?[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was No move Parsecboy (talk) 10:55, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Jeremy CanigliaCaniglia — I am trying to have Caniglia's article redirected back to its original form on April 16, 2009. Jeremy Caniglia is Caniglia and is known by the moniker Caniglia. The page was redirected by a person named Vitellia. Vitellia stated that Maria Caniglia was a more notable Caniglia. While this is just a matter of opinion, the fact is Jeremy Caniglia signs all artwork and book publications by just his Moniker Caniglia. Maria Caniglia does not. This change has caused all of Caniglia's link's to load to Maria Caniglia. In regards to the art world and Museums they know Caniglia is Jeremy Caniglia and not Maria Caniglia. I am just trying to put the page back to its original state. Any help you can give in the matter would be greatly appreciated.
thank you
Jacqui
Director of Caniglia-Art —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caniglia (talkcontribs) 19:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have made page Caniglia into a disambig page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It looks like the most relevant guideline is Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(people)#Single_name, which states in part: "Using the last name as the page title for a person, when the first name is also known, and used, is discouraged, even if that name would be unambiguous". To justify a move, it's not enough to demonstrate that people refer to the artist as "Caniglia," if his first name is known and sometimes used. Better to leave Caniglia as a disambiguation page. Baileypalblue (talk) 05:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

COI[edit]

Appears someone with a similar username as the article has been editing the article (in 2017 and earlier), currently the article reads like a resume. Adding a note here to the talk page, in case it happens again. Jooojay (talk) 07:47, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]