Jump to content

Talk:Jerraud Powers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

The old article should be recreated with the new source added. His declaring for the draft and becoming pro certainly makes him notable. There was overwhelming evidence he was notable before this announcement, but sometimes consensus gets it wrong. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:01, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In all seriousness, I agree with this sentiment. The article was clean and well-organized, and very well-sourced. I guess consensus can get it wrong. Bring the dog back! Drmies (talk) 02:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just for my own peace of mind: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerraud Powers. Drmies (talk) 15:42, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jerraud Powers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:49, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]