Talk:Jesús Blancornelas

Jesús Blancornelas has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 18, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 16, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that, Jesús Blancornelas, a Mexican journalist, risked his life while reporting on the Tijuana Cartel, the drug trade in Mexico, and political corruption?

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Human rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Mid‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tijuana (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tijuana, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TijuanaWikipedia:WikiProject TijuanaTemplate:WikiProject TijuanaTijuana articles

stomach cancer?[edit]

Can this be attributed? Word on the street here in Tijuana is that don Jesús died from other complications. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.160.133.6 (talk) 22:59, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, confirmed with reliable sources. Khazar2 (talk) 01:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

This article has been nominated for a DYK. To review or comment. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:46, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jesús Blancornelas/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 09:59, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

"In 1980, Blancornelas and co-founded the weekly magazine Zeta." - and who?
"Their courageous example in the face of adversity – and the murder of 48 journalists – is said to be inspirational.[33]" - the underlined is weasily. Suggest rewording. --Tomcat (7) 20:40, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I've fixed these. In both instances, the sentences appeared to me simply extraneous: one an accidental redundancy, the second an expendable mention of Blancornelas's inspirational qualities. If ComputerJA disagrees, though, I'm fine with some form of them going back in. Khazar2 (talk) 22:03, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think your fixes are fine, Khazar2. Thanks! ComputerJA (talk) 23:13, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]