Jump to content

Talk:Jhol (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 11 November 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Two+Two (2016 film). This is frankly a mess of a discussion, but adding 2016 is what the majority of participants have preferred and they have made a reasonable case for it. Two+Two (film) will be retargeted to the dab. I cannot say there is a consensus to move 2+2 (film) for the simple reason that no notification has been left at that article – if people want it moved, they will have to start a separate RM, though they may also want to consider Tbhotch's suggestion of Dos más dos. Jenks24 (talk) 08:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Two+TwoTwo+Two (film) – an unreleased film is not more likely that 2+2; the current title should redirect to 2+2 disambiguation page – 70.51.44.60 (talk) 08:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. sst✈(discuss) 01:21, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Gulangyu (talk) 10:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is difference between 2+2, Two & Two, Two+Two as far as page title is concerned. All should be mentioned on dab page but not moved. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 14:59, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the average person draws a strong distinction between "Two+Two" and "2+2". Both are simple mathematical expressions that are equivalent. Some people tend to use numerals while others use words when writing down numbers in prose. That is just a matter of styling. Moreover, if someone verbally told you the name of one of these film titles, there would be no difference between "2" or "Two" – they sound the same, so a parenthetical disambiguation is needed. —BarrelProof (talk) 06:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That suggestion is fine by me. I am the nominator -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There are several topic for 2+2 (dab) but not Two+Two, we should not take both as a number but as different thing (film title). Until there is no such film with this title so it shouldn't be moved. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 15:02, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've fixed an error introduced when Umais Bin Sajjad inserted a comment in the wrong place, making it appear as if I was agreeing with him, instead of with BarrelProof. To clarify, I agree with BarrelProof, and not the comment that Umais Bin Sajjad inserted into the chain above my comment. I've since restored the placement of my comment in the comment chain -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.