Talk:Jill Bryson

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 August 2024. The result of the discussion was redirect.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

TomSullivan2011 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (see also this post asserting something close to WP:Ownership of the article)

Redirect

No evidence of notability independent of her earlier band, I'm redirecting this to Strawberry Switchblade (it's currently worthy of speedy deletion). Sionk (talk) 00:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Can somebody explain what I need to do to keep Jill Bryson's page on wikipedia?Waigyuk (talk) 16:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spoke to user on IRC. Samwalton9 (talk) 17:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC) [reply]

Conflict of interest and notability (August 2024)

There's a ton of unsourced claims in this latest attempt at un-redirecting this bio, for which I can't find reliable sources online to verify per WP:Biographies of living persons. The article currently reads like it was written by a close friend or relative, and looking at its recent edit history, have found edit summaries that confirm a clear WP:Conflict of interest. I've linked them in the connected contributor template above.

On the separate matter of notability, as User:Sionk noted above ten years ago, there's still no evidence yet of notability independent of her earlier band. The few sources I can find on Bryson today are either passing mentions in connection with her first band, or interviews, which are WP:Primary sources. I'll give this a week, to see if notability can be established per WP:MUSICBIO, with significant secondary, reliable coverage. If notability can't be established I'll redirect it again, or take it to WP:AFD if necessary. Wikishovel (talk) 12:11, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably best to take it straight to Articles for Deletion if it isn't improved. There doesn't appear to be anything new that Bryson has done since 2014 to warrant the article's recreation. And it still suffers the same problems of being largely unsourced. Sionk (talk) 21:51, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]