Talk:Jinnah–Mountbatten talks
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jinnah–Mountbatten talks article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge with Kashmir conflict
[edit]is a part of larger conflict topic Shrikanthv (talk) 09:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Support in adding it into Kashmir conflict but not Kashmir conflict into this 69.165.246.181 (talk) 02:05, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- oppose Those talks are frozen in time and this conflict article has content continuing 60 years beyond that, where will that content reside? Jyoti (talk) 05:45, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose The event meets notability on itself. Mar4d (talk) 10:22, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Editing restrictions
[edit]Copied from Talk:Kashmir conflict
I'm imposing the following restrictions on this article and any other articles connected with the India Pakistan conflict over Kashmir:
- An immediate 1 RR restriction. Any attempt, even if made in good faith, to do more than one revert in a 24 hour period will lead to an immediate block.
- A revert without discussion restriction. Any revert of any edit, however minor, that is done without an explanation on the talk page will lead to an immediate block.
- A civility restriction. Any suggestion that any editor is not editing in good faith will lead to an immediate block.
- An ethnicity claim restriction Any attempt to bring the purported or deduced or imagined ethnic or nationality identities of any users will lead to an immediate block. This includes an editor's own stated ethnic identity or nationality. Wikipedia uses reliable sources and the weighting of those sources to decide what to include, what not to include, and how the content should be stated in an article. Please stick to arguments based on those factors.
- Pinging @Bishonen, EdJohnston, SpacemanSpiff, Doug Weller, and Floquenbeam: to take a look and see if anyone needs to be cautioned/blocked right now and to help keep an eye on things.
--regentspark (comment) 17:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Suggest to remove article from category "Urban Legend"
[edit]I landed on this article page while browsing the "Urban Legends" category page, but the article gives no hint why it should be classified as such. Schickfahne (talk) 17:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use Pakistani English
- Start-Class history articles
- Mid-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- Start-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Start-Class British Empire articles
- Mid-importance British Empire articles
- All WikiProject British Empire pages
- Start-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- Start-Class Jammu and Kashmir articles
- High-importance Jammu and Kashmir articles
- Start-Class Jammu and Kashmir articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Start-Class Pakistan articles
- High-importance Pakistan articles
- WikiProject Pakistan articles