Talk:Joe Hewitt (RAAF officer)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Initial Comment[edit]

I will be reviewing this GA nomination in the next couple of days. MarquisCostello (talk) 21:27, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Review Comments[edit]

A thoroughly enjoyable article to read, testament to the time you have obviously spent on it. I have passed it as a GA:

Well written: I only found one spelling error! The grammar and style are excellent. Complies with manual of style.
Factually accurate and verifiable: Has reference section. Plenty of reliable inline citation. No original research.
Broad in its coverage: Topics main aspects thoroughly explained. Topic does not unnecessarily deviate from main subject.
Neutral: Neutral style.
Stable: Article is stable, with a long history of contributions from nominator.
Illustrated, if possible, by images: Has images. Images are relevant to topic and add to article.

As an improvement, you could add a 'See Also' section at the bottom to guide readers towards other relevant wikipedia pages. MarquisCostello (talk) 12:10, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]