Talk:Johannes Paludan

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hangon[edit]

Bielle: I think one of the most important architects of Denmark should not be removed by people who know nothing about Danish architects! --Law Lord 00:06, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read what the tag says. It does not say that he is not important, it says Wikipedia cannot decide if he is important because you have not established that he is notable through including relevant references. Simply saying he's important is not enough. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 00:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]