Jump to content

Talk:John Hadley (philosopher)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 05:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would be interesting to review this. Will get to this soon. Cheers, Sainsf (talk · contribs) 05:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fairly well-written, only a few comments:

  • In the lead,
  • "Currently" may seem hazy, why not say since when he has been on the post?
  • I'm afraid I don't have a source specifying when he started; some time between 2009 and 2012, but I couldn't be more specific. Short of access to someone's CV, piecing together exact dates can be tricky. Josh Milburn (talk) 16:09, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hadley has also conducted research...the ethics of aiding others. The first line seems to say the same thing. A bit repetitive?
  • Perhaps we should make it clear in the lead how well his views have been received? Something like "mixed reactions"?
  • It could be clearer that "our" means the laypeople in ...are essentially no different to our duties...
  • "Pet" looks too common to be linked.

No copyvio detected, no dablinks, the only image in the article is properly licensed. I would be glad to promote this once all the above have been resolved. Cheers, Sainsf (talk · contribs) 14:21, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for the speedy review- I was settling down for a long wait! I've replied to your comments individually. Josh Milburn (talk) 16:09, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I see no reason excellent articles like this one should have to wait so long, so I try to give as many as I can a shove ahead. :) Sainsf (talk · contribs) 16:44, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Great, good to go. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:03, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much! Josh Milburn (talk) 17:42, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]