This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
about Thurston House small matter of link to disambiguation page[edit]
Hi to the principal editor(s) here. Just a small technical note: the article should not link to Thurston House, which is a disambiguation page. It should either just use the unlinked term Thurston House, or it could link to what currently shows as a redlink: Thurston House, East Lothian. You can choose to have the display show Thurston House. By the way in an edit summary I referred to "Thurston Place" when I meant "Thurston House". It is just wrong to link to a disambiguation page from a regular article, by guidelines on disambiguation (perhaps at wp:DAB or wp:MOSDAB?). It is good to have a redlink to suggest that an article on the topic would be welcomed, by guideline on redlinks (i think wp:redlinks?). Happy to respond further, if you're not familiar with policies/guidelines/practices regarding this small technical point. Seems like a nice article now, keep up the good work! --doncram 19:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
