Talk:John L. C. Wickham

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 10 November 2018 by reviewer DGG (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Australia: Western Australia / Law Low‑importance

	Australia portal John L. C. Wickham is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Notability[edit]

Comment: This individual does not appear to satisfy political notability or general notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:06, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon:Hi Robert, in regards to your comment above, as the person is a judge of Western Australia's highest court, the Supreme Court, he does satisfy the political notability standard. Is this a matter of requiring more sources? Username (Lawlllllll) 02:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

stub status - the nature of the referencing style does not give it start status JarrahTree 10:43, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the "nature of the referencing style" (presumably the use of direct external links rather than {{cite}} templates) is not the impediment to "Start" class. I suggest that difference between the Stub and Start quality scale criteria for references is the number and reliability of the sources, rather than whether they are wrapped in {{cite}}. (classically unsigned)

You think - if it is a new user I see no reason why they should be rewarded for poor referencing method, specially if they have been through supposed review process JarrahTree 13:20, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]