Talk:John McBain (character)

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Vote for pic[edit]

Click on show to view the contents of this section

Ok we have had some arguments about which picture should be used, personally I like the curent opening shot. Which one do you think is the best pic, to me now I don't think hair really matters, but that's my opinion so I'm gonna go with the current opening shot. P.J. (talk) 07:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, did you just say that the hair doesn't matter?? That's amusing, because in your comment here the haircut seemed to be very important to you when you updated the latest Rex Balsom image, and the difference there was very slight. The only reason you are pushing this photo is because it is the latest one, and your compulsion to update any and all photos whenever a new one appears (and regardless of how they actually look) is well-documented, and also noted in that comment I provided above.

That said, I congratulate your willingness to put this to a vote, and I will of course submit to the consensus of a decent-sized group. — TAnthony^Talk 08:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Top/Newer image[edit]

File:John McBain.jpg

Yes - Onelifefreak2007 (P.J.)

Bottom/Older image[edit]

File:Michael Easton.JPG

Yes - The sole purpose of an image in a character article is to identify what the character looks like. Yeah, he's got the same face in both pics so it doesn't really matter, but he just currently doesn't resemble the other pic, with that ugly haircut. — TAnthony^Talk 08:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes - I'm basing this solely on clarity and quality. The other picture has a glare from the background lights and this one seems more clear. I'm not sure if either of you has done this, but a note at WikiProject Soap Operas might generate more opinions. --AniMate^talk 01:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This "vote" has been scrapped due to the indefinite block of its initiator, and one image's removal by admin AniMate.— TAnthony^Talk 21:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relationship with Natalie Buchanan[edit]

Due to repeated edits moving Natalie to the spouse section of John's infobox, please take this opportunity to discuss if this is reliable information. It is my belief they were engaged once but never married, and I cannot find any sources that say otherwise. I am reverting the edits for now. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 11:24, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, they never stated that they were married.Caringtype1 (talk) 15:08, 13 October 2012 (UTC) There was no wedding.Donalds (talk) 03:22, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John McBain (character). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090201103237/http://abc.go.com/daytime/onelifetolive/episodes/2007/20071204.html to http://abc.go.com/daytime/onelifetolive/episodes/2007/20071204.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]