This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Not to be accusatory, but it seems that the creator of this page--"Philosophy 1807"--also edited several pages relating to topics in Continental Philosophy, and psychology. Is it possible that it's Russon himself? The whole page reads a bit too much like ad copy--Russon's "original philosophical contributions", the fact that the only critical quotations cited lavish praise on Russon, etc (just count the number of times the word "important" appears in the article). In my opinion, this page should be investigated by an admin and taken down if there is legitimate cause to believe he created it as a way to self-promote. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Thought-Fox (talk • contribs) 18:57, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
