Talk:Johnny Bright incident

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Newspaper article?[edit]

I've done some rudimentary editing on this article, but it actually reads like it was copied directly from a newspaper article. It sounds like an interesting event, worthy of an article, but more research would be necessary to produce a decent article. PlainJane 07:09, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article WASN'T copied directly from a newspaper article. The quotes from Johnny Bright and from Des Moines Register reporter Spiegel are the ONLY, direct quotes copied from the articles that were referenced and supported in the "Sources" section. I apologize if you feel that the article "reads like it was copied directly from a newspaper article," but I assure you that it was unintentional (I'm a lawyer, not a news reporter). Sundevilesq 12:22, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry - I wrote my comments in haste and without thinking. As I said - it sounds like an interesting issue. It's also something I (unfortunately) know nothing about - I was just editing for style. Again, I'm sorry - that was too blunt of me.

Football terminology[edit]

I'm trying to edit for content as well, and there are a few terms which aren't clear to me (as a non-football fan). Could you provide a link to the actual football team which played on that day for Oklahoma University? The link as it stands links only to the university. I have similar problems with some of the football-specific terms, which I'm trying to find links for (I'm not very good at doing links, sorry). PlainJane 07:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PlainJane, no worries! The name of the Oklahoma team/university that played Drake back in 1951 was Oklahoma A&M in Stillwater, Oklahoma. The school was later renamed Oklahoma State University. The A&M link to the Oklahoma State link is a re-direct. Sundevilesq 19:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated links[edit]

As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links), it's best to avoid repeating particular links in one article - it would be best to make only the first instance of a particular name the link (eg only the first 'Johnny Bright' should be a link to the Johnny Bright article). Excessive linking makes an article difficult to read.


Referencing[edit]

Having read through the resources listed at the end of this article, this article is not referencing its sources apropriately - when quotes are taken from other sources they should be attributed as such in the body of the article. It otherwise constitutes plagiarism. PlainJane 01:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I must disagree. There are two direct quotes, the 1951 Bob Spiegel Des Moines Register piece, and the 1980 Des Moines Register interview of Bright. Both are referenced in the body of this article. No other parts of this article are duplicated exactly or copied verbatim from other sources. I object to the implication that there is ANY "plagiarism" in this article, but the excessive linking criticism is well taken. Sundevilesq 06:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Footnotes to the Pulitzer prize-winning photo sequence added, as well as footnotes to the 2 direct quotes that appeared in the referenced, 1980 Des Moines Register article (see Sources). Please note that the quotes from the 1951 Bob Spiegel article are referenced in the 1980 article. Sundevilesq 13:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
References with footnotes added. Sundevilesq 04:30, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Trice reference[edit]

Is this incident really similar enough to the Jack Trice matter to be included as a main part of the article? Both issues were racially motivated and both involved Iowa-based college football teams, but Trice actually died during the game where Bright was just injured. I hate to call it "trivial" (because it wasn't), but maybe it should be in a Trivia (or better named) section located at the end of the article. Thoughts? Sundevilesq 19:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Johnny Bright Incident.jpg[edit]

Image:Johnny Bright Incident.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Johnny Bright incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Johnny Bright incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo's Caption Deviates from Description in Article[edit]

Resolved
 – Text edits + additional citation.

The caption for the photo-sequence describes it as being of the "first hit." The article purports that "...Bright was knocked unconscious three times by blows from Oklahoma A&M defensive tackle Wilbanks Smith. While Smith's final elbow blow broke Bright's jaw..." It then states that the photo sequence in question "...clearly showed Smith's jaw-breaking blow..." So does the 6-shot photo sequence used in the article really show the first hit as the caption denotes, or does it show Smith's final blow that broke Smith's jaw? Text revisions are needed to resolve this apparent discrepancy. ShoneBrooks (talk) 14:16, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the original cited article from the Des Moines Register: page 1, page 2. It states that Bright's jaw was broken on his very first play of the game, which is depicted in the sequence of 6 photos. He played several more plays before leaving the game in a "woozy" state. In total, it says he was "laid out" three times. There's nothing in the article that says he was "knocked unconscious" or that his jaw was broken on the "final" elbow blow. Toohool (talk) 17:49, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have revised the article text in an attempt to better align it to the facts presented in the referenced newspaper article. Unless objections to those edits arise, I'll mark this issue as resolved. ShoneBrooks (talk) 14:12, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Johnny_Bright_incident&oldid=1203114118"