Talk:Johnny Haynes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Expanding this article[edit]

In view of the sad news today of Johnny's death I'm going to expand this stub over the next hour or so. I'm going to keep an eye on this page, so please post here if you want to do something yourself. --Ormondroyd 20:51, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

...okay, done for now --Ormondroyd 21:54, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

One-club man?[edit]

Haynes was often quoted and referred to in the media as a one-club man. It was considered that he retired from 'first-class' football in 1970 from Fulham. South African league was considered more exhibitionary. And any substantiate he was on loan to Toronto City in 1961? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.4.145.187 (talk) 23:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

says "spent his entire first class career at Fulham between 1952 and 1970." on official website- http://www.fulhamfc.com/Club/ClubHistory/HistoryOverview.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.6.82.42 (talk) 19:31, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Timelines[edit]

There's been a bit of early confusion as to the date of Johnny's death. Seems now that he died on the evening of Tuesday 18th (see numerous news sources) after an accident on the 17th. Worth keeping an eye on this as the facts emerge. --Ormondroyd 06:02, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

He was in the car with "The only woman he ever loved" - can this be substantiated, or is it based on the opinion of the writer of this article. Surely such a statement is conjecture at best? It must certainly be somewhat belittling to his first two wives and any children they had.

The petition?[edit]

I'm willing to have this reverted but I've removed the details about the tribute petition. The club opened this to wide consultation and invited emails, letters, etc. The decision unless I'm very much mistaken was taken as a result of a wide range of communication from fans, and there isn't any particular evidence that I'm aware of that a single petition was any more significant than any other organised or individual communication. It just seemed a little unencyclopaedic to assert its significance in this way... that seem okay? Ormondroyd 14:16, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The riversiders?[edit]

In the section about Haynes being the first £100-week player, Fulham Fc are refered to as the riversiders, a term I have never heard used to describe Fulham before. The term isn't mentioned on the wiki page about Fulam FC either. Perhaps it ought to be changed to the Cottagers, the Whites or just Fulham FC? 163.1.36.187 (talk) 14:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johnny haynes turn.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Johnny haynes turn.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Johnny haynes turn.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haynes at the cottage.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Haynes at the cottage.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Haynes at the cottage.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Johnny Haynes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:58, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Johnny Haynes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:38, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greatest Footballer?[edit]

Thie first paragraph's purple prose includes the statement "Haynes is widely regarded as the greatest footballer ever to play for the west London club". Haynes was a great player, certainly, but that statement is nonsense. Absolute nonsense. Apart from the writer, I'm not sure you will find anyone who would agree with it. I say that not because I am anti-Haynes, but because I am pro-Moore and pro-Best. Yeah, they were in decline when they played for Fulham, but they were both far greater players than Haynes ever was. By all means keep some sort of statement in there that is less inclusive, waffle a bit about the length of his career being important in his case. He was probably much more important to Fulham than Moore and Best, but that's not what the statement claims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.18.34 (talk) 20:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Won South African league in 1970-71?[edit]

This article says Johnny made 24 appearances for Durban City in 1970-71 and also that he won the National Football League (South Africa) that season. However, the article for the National Football League (South Africa) says that the club were champions in 1969-70 and in 1971-72 but only finished third in 1970-71. As that article seems unlikely to be wrong, it looks like it is this article that is wrong: either about the season (or seasons) in which Johnny played for Durban City or else about his winning the championship with the club. His entry in 'Fulham Wiki' ( https://fulham.fandom.com/wiki/Johnny_Haynes ), says that he left Fulham for Durban City in August, 1970. Another site, 'TransferMarkt' ( https://www.transfermarkt.us/johnny-haynes/profil/spieler/136163 ) says that he joined Durban City on a free transfer from Fulham on 01 July, 1970, and left Durban City to join Wealdstone FC exactly a year later, on 01 July, 1971. If this is true, then he never won the South African championship and, sadly, never won anything in senior football. Then again, another site, 'National Football Teams' ( https://www.national-football-teams.com/player/18008/Johnny_Haynes.html ), says that he was with Durban City for both the 1970-71 season and the 1971-72 seasons and did not move to Wealdstone until the 1972-73 season, which, if true, means that he could in fact have won the South African league. 2.31.195.247 (talk) 20:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Johnny_Haynes&oldid=1207596484"