Jump to content

Talk:Jorge Capitanich

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:Capitanich.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Capitanich.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations

[edit]

Perhaps we can remove some of the details within that section. But blanketed removal of the entire section does not seem right, considering its reliable sourcing. DaltonCastle (talk) 05:38, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • See Talk:Axel Kicillof. We're not here to serve as an echo chamber for opinion pieces or violate BLP guidelines. That allegations are quoted in a newspaper without verifiability is no excuse to push it on Wikipedia. You can find op eds to suit almost any theory these days. Once again, that does not automatically warrant their use - as you should know. Thank you. Sherlock4000 (talk) 07:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    defamation without evidence
    they call the current Governor CORRUPT
    Section Text:
    Capitanich's career, stated La Nación in November 2013, has been “punctuated by harsh allegations of corruption.” He has been described elsewhere as “a true symbol of the corruption of politics in Argentina” He is said to have been a favorite of the late President Nestor Kirchner, and La Nación has called him “a loyal Kirchnerista since the first hour” and a perennial Peronist. As of November 2013, he was considered a leading contender in the presidential election of 2015.
    I request that this text sector be deleted, where the Current Governor of the Province of Chaco, Argentina is called CORRUPTED.
    They are unfounded accusations, without proof, or evidence.
    We request please correct said profile by removing that part. OscarZalazar77 (talk) 15:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Who is "we"? Is there a conflict of interest here?   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The srouces balance

[edit]

hi, I think that the sources should be balanced as the version told in he cited aritcles is only one half of the truth. IE Clarin is anti peronist. FrankRhymez (talk) 02:45, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Be more specific. Which part of the article are you talking about? Cambalachero (talk) 14:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
defamation without evidence
they call the current Governor CORRUPT
Section Text:
Capitanich's career, stated La Nación in November 2013, has been “punctuated by harsh allegations of corruption.” He has been described elsewhere as “a true symbol of the corruption of politics in Argentina” He is said to have been a favorite of the late President Nestor Kirchner, and La Nación has called him “a loyal Kirchnerista since the first hour” and a perennial Peronist. As of November 2013, he was considered a leading contender in the presidential election of 2015.
I request that this text sector be deleted, where the Current Governor of the Province of Chaco, Argentina is called CORRUPTED.
They are unfounded accusations, without proof, or evidence.
We request please correct said profile by removing that part. OscarZalazar77 (talk) 15:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"“a true symbol of the corruption of politics in Argentina” may be pushing it a bit, but "has been punctuated by harsh allegations of corruption" is fine. The corruption scandals are out there, we can't simply pretend they don't exist. Cambalachero (talk) 16:12, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]