This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
User:Asukite, User:FloridaArmy - If the issue is that this information is undue weight with regard to David Daggett, this can be decided by discussion on the article talk page or by RFC. If the issue is that the subject is not notable, I am willing to have that decided by WP:AFD. If there is some other biographies of dead people issue, please explain on the article talk page. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:17, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I do still feel that this covers Daggett more than Mountain, but it also seems that Daggett was a prominent figure in developing Mountain's story, so I can't deny his relevance here, and I can see there have been no further objections to this from the rest of the community, so I see no need to press the issue further unless somebody else wants to. I only wanted to offer input. While the article does feel a bit targeted, there are perhaps some subjects that can't be discussed factually without such an overtone. As with anything, it can always use improvement, and I'm sure it will be improved. Thanks for pinging me! ASUKITE 23:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]