Talk:Joseph Sonnabend

Joseph Sonnabend has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 3, 2015. (Reviewed version).

A news item involving Joseph Sonnabend was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 1 January 2021.

Wikipedia

AIDS Top‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject AIDS, an attempt to build a comprehensive, detailed, and accessible guide to AIDS, HIV, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.AIDSWikipedia:WikiProject AIDSTemplate:WikiProject AIDSAIDS articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

LGBTQ+ studies: Person

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
	This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.

Untitled

Looks good... nice job. MastCell 16:42, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think he's an important figure — interesting too. Trezatium 17:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The structure is still quite muddled but I'm fed up with working on it for now. Trezatium 19:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly attempts at safer sex were practised hundreds, if not thousands, of years before AIDS, albeit without the same level of knowledge. Also, no rationale is given as to why a multifactoral model is more likely to suggest the use of condoms than a single-entity infectious agent model (which is, indeed, how the rationale ultimately played out). Bluehotel (talk) 10:45, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why a multifactorial model could suggest condom use in 1983 was that it proposed that the disease was acquired by a cumulative process so that a single broken condom could be tolerated. On the other hand, a single sexual exposure to the postulated infectious agent, according to the single-entity model, was commonly viewed at that time to have lethal consequences. The risk of a broken condom was not easily acceptable to those who proposed that "a killer virus" could cause disease on a single exposure. The more general acceptance of condoms about 2 years after they were first suggested may possibly have depended on a growing understanding, with greater experience that sexual exposure was not followed by infection 100% of the time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djorman (talk • contribs) 18:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Composer

He also composed music, some of which can be heard on YouTube. The New York Times mentions his musical abilities in its obituary, February 1, 2021. Cunningpal (talk) 22:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]