This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
How to remove "neutrality of article is disputed?"[edit]
An article I wrote on Joseph W. Mountin, the founder of CDC, has been accepted and assessed as "start class," but it still retains an earlier post at the top saying the neutrality of this article is disputed." Not sure why it is disputed and was wondering who I could talk to regarding removal of that clause. Thanks in advance for any assistance. Tom NPHICTom (talk) 17:12, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is the correct place to discuss the neutrality issue. Orangemike (talk·contribs) added that during the draft phase here. There have been a number of edits since then, perhaps Orangemike can chime in if he feels it has been resolved at this point. Once consensus is reached here on the talk page, anyone can remove the NPOV tag from the article. --Krelnik (talk) 12:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Language that draws such criticism includes "widely acclaimed", "the nation's premiere" whatever, and "profound improvements in" whatever. Peacock words of that sort belong in hagiography, not in an encyclopedia. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
