This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
I recently restored the page to earlier version and it was switched back. Thats fine, maybe it sounds promotional maybe it does not. Im writing because i made a slight edit restoring the links to her published works. If these works or inappropiate please explain
(From the grammar and content of your edits, I am assuming you are Nerdypunkkid editing logged out. If I am wrong, please correct me.) Wikipedia isn't a platform for promotion (WP:NOT), and articles should be written from a neutral point of view (WP:NPOV). The articles about the four books completely failed to meet basic Wikipedia guidelines, so I turned them into redirects. You then restored the articles without fixing any of the serious problems, and then restored this article to it's previous, very poor condition. If you do not understand why the article was promotional, perhaps you should review Wikipedia's policies and guidelines some more: Wikipedia:Introduction. Wikipedia uses reliable, WP:SECONDARY sources to establish notability. The idea (on my talk page) that the books need to have their own articles to establish noteworthiness for Judy Carter is just wrong. Wikipedia relies on reliable sources. Grayfell (talk) 21:53, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}