Talk:Julian Barnes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment[edit]

I have removed from this article the allegation added by an an anonymous user on 3rd Dec, 2005 that Barnes had "lifted" a story idea and plot elements. No reference is offered for this allegation, and a google search found no other reference to it. BrownHairedGirl 03:17, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I do not think that the fact that Barnes and Dolly Parton are born on the same day deserves four lines and a strange interpretation. Remove? 03 March 2006

I second removal. We also need to find a way to better integrate the quotation, if we're keeping it. Mgriffin 02:22, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I heard JB interviewed on French radio a while back...his French wasn't the best I have heard....Pliny 23:46, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Arthur & George.jpg[edit]

Image:Arthur & George.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem[edit]

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:54, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prix Médicis[edit]

I can't find his name on the lists of the prize [1] though many articles says he recieved it, including this. In 1986 the Éstranger-prize was given to John Hawkes (Britannia) for Aventures dans le commerce des peaux en Alaska and in 1984 (as others say) Elsa Morante, Italia for Aracoeli. – --Abc10 (talk) 06:07, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know I'm over 12 years late to this, but it seems that Flaubert's Parrot won the Prix Médicis Essai, which is a separate category to the main Prix Médicis.
The official list here suggests that it was won in 1986 by Les Cinq Sens by Michel Serres, but it's widely attested that that book actually won in 1985. I'm going to add the award to the list on this page, with a source, and to the page on Flaubert's Parrot as well. It's already listed in Prix Médicis. Garnet-Septagon (talk) 13:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Postmodern writer? Who believes this?[edit]

Having read and re-read several novels by Barnes recently I was somewhat surprised to find that he is considered a postmodern writer. My overall impression was that he was not highly experimental. This article has no real discussion of this matter. I know that the views of several critics support the idea that he is a postmodernist, but wonder if this is the view of the majority? .Rwood128 (talk) 16:44, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Julian Barnes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Julian Barnes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Julian Barnes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Julian Barnes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kriegel -- Translation?[edit]

Do we have a source for him translating the Kriegel book? I'm suspicious because a) the Amazon listing I looked at mentions an introduction by Barnes, but doesn't specify a translator (not an ideal source, of course); b) it's not mentioned on his site -- http://julianbarnes.com/books/index.html -- which does mention the Daudet translation; c) I'm not aware of German being one of his many talents. HenryFlower 16:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I take it all back: the BL catalogue gives Barnes as translator too. [2] HenryFlower 19:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]