Jump to content

Talk:Julio Aparicio Díaz/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AJona1992 (talk · contribs) 21:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • Aparicio made his public début in - this is English Wikipedia not Spanish Wikipedia "début" --> "debut"
  • "He was confirmed as a torero, or matador, in 1994" - what does this statement mean?
  • "Aparicio is most famous for an incident" - "most famous for" is a WP:WEASEL word and is POV-ish
  • There are far too many redlinks, consider cleaning these up
  • Most if not all sources are not consistent with each other and are missing author(s), publishers, etc
  • Why is there a picture of Diaz in the references section?
  • After fixing these concerns, (1) please expand the article to its fullest potential (2) request a peer review (3) get the article copy-edited (4) read and re-read the criteria for a good article (5) nominate the article again. Best, Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 21:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]