Talk:Julius Streicher/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Midnightblueowl (talk · contribs) 19:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one on. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately this one is going to be a quick fail as it doesn't meet the GA criteria at this time. Of particular concern are the following issues:

The lede fails to aptly summarise the rest of the content of the article. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:21, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Large chunks of this article are simply unreferenced, and thus may constitute original research. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:21, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The use of sourcing has been unsatisfactory. When we have so many academic biographies and studies of Streicher available, why only use free web sources and the like? Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:21, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that this is going to be a fail, but hopefully these tips will help in bringing about its future improvement. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:21, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just happened upon the article and somehow it seemed to be a possible candidate. I haven't contributed anything and don't plan to, so I don't object to failing the review at all (if that even matters). Roches (talk) 00:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]