Talk:July 2016 Dhaka attack

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the July 2016 Dhaka attack article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving July 2016 Dhaka attack was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 2 July 2016.

Wikipedia

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Bangladesh Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS

The article July 2016 Dhaka attack, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:

Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

Remedy instructions and exemptions

Enforcement procedures:

Violations of any restrictions (excluding 1RR/reverting violations) and other conduct issues should be reported to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Violations of revert restrictions should be reported to the administrators' edit warring noticeboard.
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.

With respect to any reverting restrictions:

Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Twitter[edit]

Twitter is not a good source to use in the middle of a terrorist attack. Claiming 20 dead off the back of a tweet is irresponsible and contributes to the spread of rumours. Fences&Windows 20:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now replaced by a news reference. Fences&Windows 21:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Secularists" and "other Muslims"[edit]

It's entirely possible and there's an extensive historic precedent in there being Muslims who advocate for a secular society. The point being is that this article shouldn't imply that people in Bangladesh who advocate for secularism are atheistic or otherwise "not Muslim".

It's a relatively "small" objection but it's pretty relevant nonetheless. 70.27.162.84 (talk) 08:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Tried rewording. Hows the new incarnation?Lihaas (talk) 11:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Better. I'd still like to see secularists not being conflated with atheists as-- as mentioned prior-- it's entirely possible to be a secularist Muslim or Christian or what-have-you-- but it's better wording now generally. 70.27.162.84 (talk) 16:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The identity of the attackers[edit]

Your article says that someone or other said, "It is more likely that the attackers are from (the group) Al Qaeda on the Indian Subcontinent." Is it known that the attackers were South Asians? Clearly by their appearance, mannerisms and speech, witnesses would have been able to identify them as such. Any news about that? Fowler&fowler «Talk» 16:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The AQIS references have been removed. We have primary and secondary sources that state the attack was carried out by ISIS. Ottre 18:03, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm afraid we don't. It has been claimed by ISIS. The Inspector General of Police Dhaka has stated that all attackers were Bangladesh citizens and they had been looking for them. The US State Department has not confirmed any affiliation yet. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 18:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it wouldn't hurt to wait another 24 hours for a counter-claim from AQIS. This LWJ article published 4 hours ago clearly says Islamic State was responsible for the attack. Ottre 23:10, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Indian source like this says that they're not from ISIS. Ayub407^talk 08:19, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Title of article should be changed[edit]

The title of the article "2016 Gulshan attack" should be changed. Something like "2016 Gulshan attack" is only used if another attack in the area had taken place earlier or later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.96.135.105 (talk) 20:22, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermath of the Attack[edit]

Should there be a section on recent coverage?

"In a talk at the University of Toronto Scarborough Campus on Saturday, Tahmid Hasib Khan took to the stage to describe in detail what happened at the Holey Artisan Cafe, offering for the first time his own account of one of the deadliest terrorist attacks in Bangladesh’s history"

https://news.vice.com/en_ca/article/59x37x/tahmid-hasib-khan-survived-a-massacre-of-20-people-only-to-be-blamed-for-it

Hp0690 (talk) 17:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Last names of the officers killed are not consistent[edit]

At one point it says

"Alerted by the gunfire, police detective Rabiul Karim and officer-in-charge Salauddin Khan started to investigate. Other police officers responded, arriving at the restaurant. The attackers then engaged in a shootout with the police. Police cordoned off the area around the restaurant and planned a rescue raid. The attackers however threw grenades and fired, killing officers Karim and Khan.[13]"

but afterwards

"Rabiul Islam, Assistant Commissioner of Detective Branch of the Dhaka Metropolitan Police, and Salahuddin Ahmed"

Maybe the last names are getting confused with those of hostages?

"Two of the hostages, Tahmid Hasib Khan and Hasnat Karim, were taken by police for questioning, and subsequently vanished amidst confusion about whether they had been released or not.[47][48]"