Talk:Jumanji (Azealia Banks song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jumanji (Azealia Banks song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CaliforniaDreamsFan (talk · contribs) 06:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, my name is CaliforniaDreamsFan, and I'll be reviewing your article! Full review coming soon, so stay tuned!

Infobox[edit]

  • Remove the caption; it's not necessary if its the only cover.
  • Add an alt to the image please.

Lead section[edit]

  • Add the release year of Fantasea in parentheses.
  • ""Jumanji" is composed as a tropical track with a "strong bass" influenced by kuduro, dancehall, and calypso music." — "Jumanji is composed as a tropical track with musical influences of kuduro, dancehall, and calypso music." Don't add a quote unless there is a reference (having said that, its advised not to have citations in the lead).
  • Lyrically, Banks "delivers lines about media scandals and keeping true to herself". — Same thing here; try and describe it by saying something like "Lyrically, the song deals with Banks' involvement with media scandals and, as she described, "keeping true to herself".
  • Add additional details of live performances that track was included into.

Background and composition[edit]

  • Add the release year of Fantasea in parentheses.
  • Remove quote marks from "Fantastic", as it was considered to be used as an album title.
  • ""Jumanji" is a tropical song with a "strong bass" and elements of kuduro, dancehall, and calypso music." — Same as lead.
  • There are way too many clunked references in specific sentences (WP:Citation overkill). Try and be descriptive of each critic that sees the track in these identified genres, and expand on it.
  • "Instrumentally, the song has "ethereal twinkles of a harp", "elephantine trumpet blares", a "loudly clanging timpani", calypso steel drums, and "bomb-tick hi-hats"" — Again, too many sources in a sentence. Try and separate it in a way that individual critics have identified these instruments; example "According to () and () from () and (), they had identified instrumentation of a harp, trumpets, etc. However, () from () noticed the use of "calypso drums".
  • "Despite the song's title, the song's content is not based on the movie of the same name." — Unless there is a link verifying this statement, I feel this is slightly trivial.
  • In an article about "Jumanji", Grant Trimboli of Under the Gun Review opined that the song had a "Caribbean vibe"." — Shouldn't this be near the description of genres as stated above?
  • Unlike "music critic"; you already have it.

Critical reception[edit]

  • When you state anthem; if it is quoted by a critic as an "anthem" or "summer anthem", then use quotation marks.
  • Everything else is really good.

Accolades[edit]

  • These are literally two sentences; just try and merge it with the critical reception section, and split that one large paragraph into two.

Live performances[edit]

  • Are the performances really "notable"? You could probably just say "another performance".

Overall GA conclusion[edit]

A really good article! On hold for 7 days for additional editing. Please ping me for any inquires or when you have finished! Good luck . CaliforniaDreamsFan (talk · contribs} 04:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jumanji (Azealia Banks song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]