Jump to content

Talk:Just a Souvenir

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

isn't this a bit off? ""Just A Souvenir" is a massive let down, nothing like the fantastic quality of his older music." even if it is a let down? -dcd

Wikipedia isn't the place to discuss that kind of thing, this page is for discussing the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liquidcow (talkcontribs) 16:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC) Apologies dcd, misunderstood what you were getting at. I thought you were saying that yourself, I realize now you were quoting something someone put in an earlier version of the article. Yes, comments like that are completely out of place on Wikipedia as they are sheer opinion, and should be immediately removed. I noticed that there have been a couple of other instances of people trying to state opinion as fact in the history of this article - 'fans are disappointed by this album' etc, which has no citation to support it. People need to stop trying to put the opinions of themselves and a few of their mates in articles as if they are facts. The album does seem to be drawing negative or lukewarm reviews but we'll have to wait until more are available before a broader picture starts to appear and/or the album gets a rating on Metacritic etc.Liquidcow (talk) 20:07, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Just a Souvenir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:42, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Just a Souvenir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:59, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]