Talk:Just the Way You Are (Bruno Mars song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 00:39, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • There are a handful of issues with the external links according to the toolbox on the right.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 08:23, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • A couple still remain.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:00, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • Could you explain to me what does this means in some of the links? "Changes domain" and how to fix it? Thank you MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 01:39, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        • The ones that say changes domain are fine. The only one that continues to be a problem is the romanialibera.ro domain link. It seems to be redirecting as if the link was not evergreened and is now dead.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:15, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
          • I repleaced the link by a new one with the same info. Please take a look, I believe all the problems with links are now fixed. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:58, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
WP:LEAD

--I don't understand when you mean "link the billboard charts" can you show me an example? Same goes for Radio 1. No cover have charted. I don't believe is such a thing regarding the list of "best selling digital singles of all time" MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:32, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Writing and production
Can you tell me what's wrong with A&R?
I don't know what A&R is? Please clarify.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:05, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Artists and repertoire (A&R) is the division of a record label or music publishing company that is responsible for talent scouting and overseeing the artistic development of recording artists and/or songwriters. It also acts as a liaison between artists and the record label or publishing company; every activity involving artists to the point of album release is generally considered under the purview of, and responsibility of, A&R." - wiki. I have put a disambiguation link to the definition. Ok I will find more two or three that I have seen. I ahve moved the version by Pierce the Veil including the single infobox but I don't think it's important the infobox and it also ruins the article so we could delete it. What's your opinion?MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 02:06, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You linked it to the second use. I moved the link to the first use. Even linked it does not provide context. Please re-evaluate and consider how to clear this up. Maybe add a word or two. Is an A&R a type of representative?--03:54, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
I cleared up a bit in order to give a little definition of what the A&R have done in the process of developing this song.MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:06, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Can you move the clarification to the first use of the term.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done.MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is Aaron Bay-Schuck a person or a company. If it is a person, change which to who.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Release
Composition and lyrical interpretation
I believe they have all are inside quotes.MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:26, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What about instrumentation and vocal range?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:24, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I thought that terms inside quotes were only those refering to reviews of the song. I guess you are right, all done I believe. Thank you for the tips. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:32, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand what you just said and I don't understand your response to the two terms I mentioned above.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I was saying that I didn't no I had to quote the instrumentation and vocal range. I only thought it was the reviews of the song describing it. Everything it's quoted. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That was not what I meant. In general we don't use wikilinks on words inside quotes. However, neither of these was in quotes. I was wondering if there are wikilinks.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I get it now. Sorry but I never did something like this before so some terms are new to me and I might missintrepert some vocabulary. Now it's correct, please check it. Thank You MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 00:57, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It does not appear that either is linked right now. Could you further clarify what you have linked to address this concern.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Both remain unlinked. What am I suppose to check?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:08, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I thought that you meant that you didn't want wikilinks there. I have provided a wikilink for everything meaningful that is out of quote. Please take a look MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:28, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I was asking if you feel you should link instrumentation and vocal range?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:22, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, most of the articles including GA and FA. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 23:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand your response. what are you waiting on?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:52, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have linked instumentation and vocal range(relevant wikilinks regarding the composition of the song). I was just saying that the majority of FA and GA articles have wikilinks on that section.MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:19, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reception and accolades
Commercial performance
I provided a link and clear up the setence MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:06, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Development and synopsis
Live performances
Track listing
All of the versions have been described.MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:26, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chart precession and succession
Pierce the Veil version
References
General
Images
I'm not 100% sure what do you want me to improve in the File:Bruno Mars - Just the way you are video.jpg coud you explain it differently? Thank You MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:50, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am putting this On Hold. I will monitor progress and review this after 7 days.
I have improved what you asked until the Track Listening section, could you take a look? Thank You.Also the "Chart precession and succession" section is organized by dates, when the single first reached number one. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have another show on the live performances. How many are needed? I have added some text to the Track Listening it is that what you are looking for? I have replaced some of the dead links, also.
Add all the live performances you can document.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:05, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'll look at the Track listing prose when I get a chance.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:05, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Updated status[edit]

I will try to improve it. Done, it's near to impossible to find a source describing that.MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not responding. I believe that should be removed since there is no information regarding charts and sales info. Should I nominated it again? It took a long time for a 2nd opinion on that grammy sculpture. Thank you MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.