Talk:Justin Yu/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Johnson524 (talk · contribs) 18:30, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: LunaEclipse (talk · contribs) 13:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also reviewing this one. School might get in the way, so don't expect me to respond immediately. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 ⚧ ^{【=◈︿◈=】} 13:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LunaEclipse: Thank you so much for taking up another Tetris article review! Take all the time you need, and cheers! Johnson524 01:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnson524: Apologies for leaving you in the dust. I'll probably start reviewing by this weekend. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 ⚧ ^{【=◈︿◈=】} 14:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·