Talk:Justine Sacco

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Online shaming
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Online shaming

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

No consensus, 2020 August 14, see discussion.
Delete, 22 December 2013, see discussion.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because Justine Sacco is mentioned in the IAC/InterActiveCorp page. A redirect would be helpful for those looking up her name. --Tinton5 (talk) 20:56, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, she is mentioned, but there was a lengthy discussion about whether a redirect was warranted, which had a strong consensus that it wasn't. L Faraone 21:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe if that's the case another discussion should take place. Tinton5 (talk) 21:20, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion discussion was on a redirect to another article, namely Twitter, so WP:CSD G4 is not applicable, when this looked to be a transient incident. Now, at a different location, we have a relevant section so the speedy should be declined and a new RFD discussion opened. The Whispering Wind (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support keep per tWW NE Ent 22:57, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sacco at FanDuel[edit]

This doesn't make Sacco relevant, but collecting in case that changes: "On Dec. 28, I had a phone conversation with Justine Sacco, FanDuel’s director of communications.... I asked Justine Sacco why FanDuel allowed scripting at all. She told me: ... ". "How the Daily Fantasy Sports Industry Turns Fans Into Suckers", New York Times, 6 Jan 2016, Jay Caspian King. tedder (talk) 03:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]