Talk:København (ship)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The name of the ship[edit]

Since this is an article about a ship, shouldn't it use the actual name instead of the English translation? An example would be "Star of India". This ship has pages in German and Polish, but both use the English name, although "India" has translations in both languages. I don't know how to make this kind of change but think the title should be "Køpenhavn". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Another-sailor (talk • contribs) 10:14, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2012 wreck discovery[edit]

I have removed a cited paragraph using this source as the basis for claiming a co-investigation between the Danish authorities and the people of Tristan da Cunha into a wreck discovered off Cave Point, alleged to be the 'København', for the following three reasons:

The source is of dubious quality, being a commercial magazine printing a tabloid-esque story which was popular on "mystery/paranormal" websites and blogs around the time.
The official Tristan da Cunha website mentions discovery of a wreck of a large sailing vessel off Cave Point in November 2011. However, the name 'København' is not brought up and nothing indicates that any identification was ever made or that any formal investigation was ever carried out. The news section of the same website has no articles from the time period relating to the wreck.
The Copenhagen Post carried an article in November 2016 on the 'København' that contains no mention of any wreck discovery or investigation carried out by the Danish government.

79.72.143.44 (talk) 13:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on København (ship). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090209001413/http://www.soefart-frem.dk/ to http://www.soefart-frem.dk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]