Jump to content

Talk:K-204 (Kansas highway)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 01:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • Just a suggestion but, I don't think its necessary to specify the Kansas State Highway Commission in the lead and just present its current name. The nuance can go into the body. The Kansas Department of Transportation should be wiki-linked.

Assessment

[edit]
  1. Comprehension: The comprehension is good.
  2. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) The prose is clear and concise. Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) The article is compliant with the manual of style. Pass Pass
  3. Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
  4. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) The article has a list of references and in line citations for all material in the body. Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) Sources used are reliable Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) No original research found. Pass Pass
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) No copyright violation or plagiarism found. Pass Pass
  5. Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive.
  6. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) The article covers all major aspects. Pass Pass
    (b) (focused) No unnecessary deviations are present. Pass Pass
  7. Neutrality: The article is neutral.
  8. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view. Pass Pass
  9. Stability: The article is stable.
  10. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    No ongoing edit warring or content disputes. Pass Pass
  11. Illustration: The illustration is sufficient.
  12. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) N/A Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Caption is suitable. Pass Pass