Talk:K-232 (Kansas highway)
Appearance
![]() | K-232 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 6, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Post Rock Scenic Byway is so named because of limestone fenceposts? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:K-232 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 00:11, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
I will review this article immediately. TCN7JM 00:11, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
I have the following concerns:
- You should modify the conversion template to read "17.263-mile-long" by having it read
{{convert|17.263|mi|km|adj=mid|-long}}
. - Try to cut down starting so many sentences in the lead with "K-232".
- Regarding the first sentence in the history, I don't think it's referred to that often as "Route K-232".
- Is it possible to reword the first sentence so that it reads "between Interstate 70 and what was then U.S. Route 40" or something? I think this would be better for flow, despite the current name of the road being "Old U.S. 40".
- I'd rather not, but if you insist I will. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 17:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- It's okay as-is, I guess. TCN7JM 11:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
- I'd rather not, but if you insist I will. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 17:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- Was the route paved when it was designated? If not, when?
- I can't find this information, but knowing Kansas it's highly likely that it was. I just don't think there will be any sources out there to say. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 17:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- Looking at the first map that had K-232 on it is usually enough. I tried to check the map myself, but my browser won't open the file for some reason. TCN7JM 11:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
- I can't find this information, but knowing Kansas it's highly likely that it was. I just don't think there will be any sources out there to say. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 17:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- "K-18/K-232 highway" doesn't sound common either.
- You start both paragraphs of the route description with "K-232" and that does look overused within those paragraphs. You should try to switch up the nouns a bit.
- You should use
{{convert/spell}}
for the single-digit mileages near the end of the second paragraph.
I will put this article on hold to fix these concerns. TCN7JM 00:49, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Alright, all of my concerns seem to have been addressed. I will pass this article. Good job. TCN7JM 12:29, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class U.S. state highway articles
- Mid-importance U.S. state highway articles
- GA-Class Road transport articles
- Mid-importance Road transport articles
- U.S. state highway articles
- GA-Class Kansas road transport articles
- Mid-importance Kansas road transport articles
- Kansas road transport articles
- GA-Class U.S. road transport articles
- Mid-importance U.S. road transport articles
- U.S. road transport articles
- GA-Class Kansas articles
- Low-importance Kansas articles
- WikiProject Kansas articles