Talk:Kaiyethum Doorath

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

On 10 June 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Kai Ethum Doorathu. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Requested move 10 June 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Cannot confirm which spelling is the most common. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:13, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kaiyethum Doorath → Kai Ethum Doorathu – All sources/reviews from time of release use this name: here, here and here. DareshMohan (talk) 22:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. >>> Extorc.talk 06:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:22, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – the current title appears to be the common name. A Google News search finds substantially more results for the current title than the proposed title (although a handful are referring to the TV series). Perhaps sources used the proposed title more often in 2002 than they do now, but no policy or guideline tells us to give more weight to older sources. Glad to reconsider if there's something I've missed. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:21, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.