Talk:Kaksparsh

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kaksparsh article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Kaksparsh has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 16, 2014. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Kaksparsh appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 August 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the soundtrack of the Marathi film Kaksparsh (2012) was released after the film's theatrical release on public demand and features songs rendered without any musical accompaniment?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kaksparsh.

Wikipedia

India: Maharashtra / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kaksparsh/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dwaipayanc (talk · contribs) 03:30, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting plot. Liked it. Will review gradually.

" Hari, then, mumbles something while offering food which leads to the desired." Did not understand this sentence. "which leads to the desired"? what desired?
"...Hari opposes and does not allow any practised rituals to be performed for her as a widow, which were performed for his widowed aunt, Namu Aatya " You mean those rituals were done to the widowed aunt in the past, right? In any case, seems this bit of info on the widowed aunt is not needed.
Overall, the plot looks quite big. Can it be trimmed down?
"Manjrekar had seen 2011 National Award winning film Shala and was..." The name of the film needs to be in italics.
" The film also had a few scenes in and surrounding the temple, so the next schedule was shifted to Krishna Ghat, Wai, Maharashtra as most of the temples in Konkan region have been restored from their damages over the period of time" Could not understand the point here. What is the effect of most temples in Konkan being restored on the shifting of shooting location?--Dwaipayan (talk) 03:30, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking up the review Dwaipayan. I was/am busy in the real life so was not acting for a while. Please give me some time. I will resolve the respective concerns. - Vivvt (Talk) 17:01, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have resolved the above mentioned concerns. Please let me know if anything else needs to be fixed. - Vivvt (Talk) 04:59, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are several dead external links, detected by the external link tool linked in this review page. Please fix those. --Dwaipayan (talk) 15:49, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some archived URLs plus replaced some URLs with the new ones. Please check and let me know if you find any issues. - Vivvt (Talk) 08:01, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Frustrated and unknowing of what loss she had throughout her life, Uma opens her heart but situation raises more questions." Not clear about the meaning. Situation raises more questions? Vague.

I have tried clarifying but if its not enough I would prefer removing the sentence as there is too much to explain about the overall scene in the plot.

"Uma decides to go on a fast and relents to none of the family member's request to quit" I am not sure but readers not acquainted with the religious concept of fasting may have trouble understanding this. May be some clarification or wikilinking needed.

Wikilink added

"When he learned that Uma has started loving him, he stopped talking to her, in spite of his love towards her." When did Hari learn that Uma loves him? That is not mentioned in the plot.Earlier in the plot, it is mentioned that "Disgusted by Uma's behaviour, Hari stops talking to her."

Changed and clarified.

"he took a vow that he would not let any other man touch Uma." Is it literally touch? Or, did he vow that he would not let Uma be married/sexually active etc?

Yeah...Literally touch.

"Rahul Ranade used Vibhavari Joshi's voice for all of his compositions except "Janma Baicha", which were rendered by her without any musical accompaniment" So, Joshi did sing Janma Baicha, right? The sentence is self-contradictory.

Corrected.

"For two situation songs, he requested Kishor Kadam to write the lyrics" Who is he?

Clarified.

I think there is too much information on the remake.--Dwaipayan (talk) 23:35, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Till the new page about the remake is fully developed, I would keep the information here. For now, its a redirect to the current page. Once its suitable, I would move it to the appropriate article. - Vivvt (Talk) 09:17, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, the article meets GA criteria.--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:07, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I appreciate your time and efforts. - Vivvt (Talk) 16:36, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kaksparsh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]