Talk:Kamboja Pala dynasty

India: West Bengal / History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as High-importance).

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Vandalusm

Before placing this nonsensical and irrelevant template here, come and discuss the information in this article from historical point of view. This is vandalusm. Sze cavalry01 18:53, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied here. - Ganeshk (talk) 07:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion

Propose merge. They are the same dynasty, or variants of the same dynasty. Should be covered in one article within the series on the History of Bengal. Itsmejudith (talk) 18:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear. There seems to be no end to Kamboja-cruft. Merge away. Moreschi (talk) 00:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They were a separate kingdom from the Pala Empire whose rulers used the same suffix; pala(which just means Protector in Sanskrit). I disagree with the merge since they were neither the same dynasty nor a variant of them. Perhaps it would be less confusing if the article was moved to Kamboja-Pala Kingdom instead--Reahad (talk) 21:21, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Pala dynasty (Kamarupa) for another example of an independent dynasty with the same suffix.--Reahad (talk) 22:22, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you can improve these articles without merger then that is great. We need editors who know this history. Please go ahead. Itsmejudith (talk) 22:29, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Opposed. Though there is room for improvement the article by itself seems legitimate.--Joostik (talk) 15:00, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Native name

(Punjabi: ਕਮ੍ਬੋਜ, Hindi: कम्बोज) Were inappropriately listed on the Sanskrit article on the Kamboja but might be the name of this dynasty. If they are, please add to the lede, with transliterations. — LlywelynII 20:22, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No such dynasty

It might be worth pointing out in the article that there never was a Kamboja Pala dynasty.PiCo (talk) 10:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mleccha

Though many have translated Mlechchha (Malecha etc.)in their own ways as foreigners (mistranslation) etc. the name actually refers to the inhabitants of the Indus Valley Civilization (Meluhha, Melussa). --Novo24 (talk) 04:05, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Map of Bengal in 958 CE.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:38, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]