Talk:Kamerun campaign

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move?[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 12:03, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kamerun campaign → Kamerun Campaign – fix capitalization. relisted --Mike Cline (talk) 17:43, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Nmillers (talk) 21:09, 17 February 2013 (UTC) Nmillers (talk) 21:09, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Why should the article be renamed when the word "campaign" is not even capitalized in the opening sentence of the article? The article name/capitalization and the opening sentence should match. Steel1943 (talk) 00:53, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • When I first wrote the article I mistakenly believed that in article titles the word 'campaign' was not to be capitalized. I have since looked at the titles of other articles concerning military campaigns and have found that there, the 'c' is always capitalized. I will gladly change the capitalization issue in the opening paragraph if this is the only problem. Thank you for your quick reply. Nmillers (talk) 10:19, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Now that I am aware of this policy in the Wikipedia space due to another request I made myself earlier being shot down due to this, I Oppose this move per WP:NCCAPS. Steel1943 (talk) 04:29, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The reason I wished to move the article to capitalize the 'c' was for the title to fit in with the styles of other articles concerning First World War campaigns. Each WWI campaign article I have seen (except the Mesopotamian campaign) has the 'c' capitalized such as East Africa Campaign, South-West Africa Campaign and West Africa Campaign. John Horne's A Companion to World War I, a source that has been frequently consulted capitalizes the 'c' in Kamerun Campaign. If the policy on Wikipedia is to move away from excessive capitalization, would it be necessary to move all other articles so their titles would have the lower case 'c' in campaign? Again, the only reason I proposed this move was to have the article title fit in more closely to the conventions used in associated articles about military campaigns. If the less capitalization policy is applicable in this situation, I would be happy to drop my request. Nmillers (talk) 09:30, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ngrams does not find Campaign,[1] but there are very few for campaign either. Apteva (talk) 00:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support The term is a proper noun in that it refers to a specific set of events. Current capitalization would be better as part of a longer title, such as Kamerun campaign of World War I, though please note I am not advocating such a name. --BDD (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

CE[edit]

Did a quick drive-by ce of the citations and took the red off various items, found references where indicated.Keith-264 (talk) 18:06, 8 May 2014 (UTC)-[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kamerun Campaign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:54, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 April 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 14:49, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kamerun Campaign → Kamerun campaign – This page's title was capped on the flimsiest of rationale and support possible, back in 2013. Sources don't generally cap campaign for this one, just like most others, as n-grams verifies. Dicklyon (talk) 04:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Casualties[edit]

Numbers don’t make sense. Over one hundred years have gone by. No need for continued lies. 2600:1700:1150:AFA0:AD8F:2FFB:36F3:7279 (talk) 03:29, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kamerun_campaign&oldid=1212537471"