Talk:Kaminarimon
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kaminarimon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080224224816/http://www7.ocn.ne.jp/~sehayama/topics4kaminarimon.htm to http://www7.ocn.ne.jp/~sehayama/topics4kaminarimon.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:34, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Merge
[edit]Torsodog. I did a WP:BOLD merge of this and Hōzōmon to Sensō-ji, so WP:BRD. Seeing as both gates are part of the Sensō-ji site, it makes no sense to have this content spread across three separate pages. Since they are all related, sources discuss them together, and readers would want to learn about them together, they should be presented together. The Japanese article also covers all of Sensō-ji in one article. By no means is the main article long enough to require a split. Reywas92Talk 00:54, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- reywas92. Well I'd prefer a discussion about it rather than you unilaterally making the decision as I'm not sure I agree with you. Please start a discussion about it so a consensus can be reached. --TorsodogTalk 01:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- I'm allowed to do something and then we WP:BRD...This is literally the "D" part of that, you can reply here. Both gates lead to Sensō-ji, so both should be covered in that article, and it currently holds this relevant information without any organizational issues or excessive length. Reywas92Talk 02:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Image
[edit]I've fixed the image caption (which falsely claimed it showed fūjin and raijin) to indicate that it shows the back of the gate, but wouldn't it be better to use a photo showing the front of the gate (and its iconic statues)? — Troyp (talk) 17:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)