Jump to content

Talk:Kanagala

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article for Deletion

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 00:32, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kanagala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Least Important and it is a village not known to anybody . No information available and not fit to be a article KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 13:30, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 16:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Swarm 22:37, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 08:27, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all villages are notable per WP:GEOLAND, and there is no reason to delete - the government of India knows of this village and its 7000 people disproving the nominator's statement to the contrary. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - This should have been a speedy keep as soon as NA1000 posted his link to an Indian government website demonstrating that this is a recognized village for national census purposes. Being held over once was unnecessary, twice was flat out bizarre. Click the link and we are done per WP:GEOLAND. Bad nomination and lame debate facilitation... Carrite (talk) 15:43, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kanagala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:43, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]