Jump to content

Talk:Kaname Harada/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 14:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Will come back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent job Nick. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: Sorry for my slow response; somehow I missed that you'd posted the review. I think that I've now addressed your comments. Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]