Talk:Kang (Star Trek)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Canon[edit]

For one thing, I have not heard of such a person named Dax Kang. this is outragious....go read Pawns and Symbols by Majliss Larson...Kang's first born sons name is Aethenor...go check it out...

If Pawns and Symbols is a fanfic, then it's not Star Trek canon. Dax son of Kang is mentioned in the Deep Space Nine episode "Blood Oath." ShutterBugTrekker 13:23, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just got done watching Blood Oath and you are correct....thanks for the enlightenment. Take care and have Merry Christmas and joy filled new year. KMelKang

Kommander Kang[edit]

Have you not read Pawns and Symbols by Majliss Larson yet? Let me know when and if you do.

No, I haven't. I would probably only read it if someone gives it to me as a Christmas or birthday gift.

As far as Wikipedia is concerned, Star Trek novels are not canon and thus are irrelevant. ShutterBugTrekker 16:30, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

About Canon:[edit]

I now understand the ideals of "Canon" I will agree with the ideas of it too. I have gone and done some research and will agree to what is "canon" and what is not "canon"...even though it is hard for me to do that....but it does make sence. :-(