Jump to content

Talk:Karen Bradley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Karen Bradley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:06, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brexit

[edit]

What is her position on brexit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.32.68.244 (talk) 19:40, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image

[edit]

I was just wondering why her official portrait has been removed as her image on this article. Any explanation would be helpful. Thanks. 81.98.161.139 (talk) 23:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NI

[edit]

Nothing wrong with adding her comments on NI with a reliable source. Without a source, forget it. ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 19:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is fine you added refs, not fine that you made a fake revert. However, this quote is unnecessary, especially given the problem of WP:RECENTISM] with the addition so I removed it. Please do not add again without contributing here first. "Yesterday I made comments regarding the actions of soldiers during the Troubles. I want to apologise. I am profoundly sorry for the offence and hurt that my words have caused. The language was wrong and even though this was not my intention, it was deeply insensitive to many of those who lost loved ones." LOng-winded and OTT for an encyclopedia about a quote made this week. ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 18:13, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I hit 'undo' and added references in that edit. Hitting 'undo' restores the prior content. I included an edit summary, "expand and add references", after the auto-generated one. Is there something wrong with that? I didn't pretend or 'fake' anything. No need to post both here and on my userpage - just here would have done fine. The "long winded" quote is a single line, but whatever, leave it out. I'll add it back if she's sacked or resigns. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 22:25, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]